The QA-I toner is produced at the company’s dedicated toner production plant in Heultje, Belgium. For example, most UV-inks are unsuitable for indirect food contact as non-cross linked molecules or photoinitiators present in the cured ink could migrate through the packaging and contaminate the food being packaged. Other printing technologies that involve UV-inks or solvent-based liquid inks do not always meet the FDA guidelines as they contain low molecular weight components. By utilizing Xeikon’s latest technology, label converters can gain a unique competitive edge in the markets they serve. The Xeikon QA-I toner meets all the applicable FDA guidelines for indirect food contact under room temperature and less severe conditions as well as direct food contact for dry food substances containing no surface oil or fat under the same conditions.įood safety is of the highest priority for label converters, as nearly 40 percent of the digitally produced labels are used for food packaging applications. Indirect food contact refers to printed materials that are located on the outside packaging of the food. With direct food contact, the printed material comes into contact with the food. The two types of food contact are direct and indirect. In addition, FDA also sets guidelines with respect to the printed materials in contact with food. Some of these guidelines are with respect to the actual materials being used to produce the labels, such as inks, toners and substrates. In the United States, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sets guidelines that must be followed with regard to food, whether packaged or not. With the launch of the Xeikon 3500 digital label production press and QA-I toner, the company has taken the suitability of its technology for food packaging applications to an entirely new level. There's no timetable on any of these improvements, but I just wanted to let folks here know what we're considering for the product.Xeikon has been a pioneer in digital color printing and dry toner technology since its inception more than 20 years ago. if we make it harder than that to use, we've failed in my opinion. More than anything else, we fully intend to keep the elegant simplicity of the product, rather than bloat it with esoteric features. This means licensing a quality sound library, something we've been looking into. Bundling ringtones! We'd like to be able to ship the product with a bunch of cool ringtones people can choose from. Going along with the above, we'd also like to be able to transcode the ringtones into bitrates more suitable for iPhone ringtones, convert them to mono, and optionally boost the dynamic range of the ringtones so that they will sound more crisp and clear on the iPhone's build in speaker. This opens up a can of worms that I won't get into here, but suffice it to say that because of the transcoding that's required, it'll be a bit of work to do it right. Drag a song over, and iToner lets you pick what part of it to use as a ringtone. It's something we absolutely want to be able to do. Instead of being limited to uploading ringtones to iPhones, it'd then work with just about any phone. Adding bluetooth support, so that iToner will work with any cell phone that has bluetooth. So what does the future hold for iToner? Now that the update scrambling is seemingly over, we're thinking about the following features: With a sigh of relief, we then cleaned up a few things, adding a bit more spiff to the interface, and released iToner 1.0.2 just recently. I think a good indication of how we did is that when Apple updated iTunes from 7.4.1 to 7.4.2, they broke all of the other non-Jailbreak techniques for putting ringtones on your iPhone, but iToner continued to work unmodified. We wanted to ensure that iToner continued to work with iTunes updates, and burned the midnight oil to ensure that happened. The first few weeks of iToner's existence were all about survival. So just to give you an idea of what we're thinking regarding iToner, here it goes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |